[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later` |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Apr 2024 18:44:05 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
> Do this mean (run-with-timer 0 nil ...) can always be replaced with a
> more efficient (funcall-later ...)? If so, would it make sense to
> modify run-with-time as well to call funcall-later when if its first two
> argument is (0 nil)?
No: beside the fact that they are run at slightly different times
(which might be OK), `funcall-later` doesn't return a handle you can
then use to cancel the call.
Stefan
- bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`, Stefan Monnier, 2024/04/05
- bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/04/06
- bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/04/06
- bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`, Stefan Monnier, 2024/04/06
- bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/04/06
- bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`, Stefan Monnier, 2024/04/06
- bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/04/06
- bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`, Stefan Monnier, 2024/04/06
- bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/04/07