[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`
From: |
Felician Nemeth |
Subject: |
bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later` |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Apr 2024 10:14:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) |
>> Cc: 70221@debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 18:44:05 -0400
>> From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
>>
>> > Do this mean (run-with-timer 0 nil ...) can always be replaced with a
>> > more efficient (funcall-later ...)? If so, would it make sense to
>> > modify run-with-time as well to call funcall-later when if its first two
>> > argument is (0 nil)?
>>
>> No: beside the fact that they are run at slightly different times
>> (which might be OK), `funcall-later` doesn't return a handle you can
>> then use to cancel the call.
Does "running at slightly different times" mean that the compat package
cannot reimplement funcall-later with run-with-time?
Thanks again.
- bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`, Stefan Monnier, 2024/04/05
- bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/04/06
- bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/04/06
- bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`, Stefan Monnier, 2024/04/06
- bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/04/06
- bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`, Stefan Monnier, 2024/04/06
- bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/04/06
- bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`, Stefan Monnier, 2024/04/06
- bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/04/07
bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`, Sean Whitton, 2024/04/06