[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later` |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Apr 2024 09:59:01 +0300 |
> Cc: 70221@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 18:44:05 -0400
> From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
>
> > Do this mean (run-with-timer 0 nil ...) can always be replaced with a
> > more efficient (funcall-later ...)? If so, would it make sense to
> > modify run-with-time as well to call funcall-later when if its first two
> > argument is (0 nil)?
>
> No: beside the fact that they are run at slightly different times
> (which might be OK), `funcall-later` doesn't return a handle you can
> then use to cancel the call.
This should be mentioned in the documentation.
- bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`, Stefan Monnier, 2024/04/05
- bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/04/06
- bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/04/06
- bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`, Stefan Monnier, 2024/04/06
- bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/04/06
- bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`, Stefan Monnier, 2024/04/06
- bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/04/06
- bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`, Stefan Monnier, 2024/04/06
- bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/04/07
bug#70221: [PATCH] New function `funcall-later`, Sean Whitton, 2024/04/06