|
| From: | Ben Pfaff |
| Subject: | Re: split stdio-safer into fopen-safer, tmpfile-safer |
| Date: | Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:21:59 -0700 |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes: > With Bison I wanted fopen_safer but not tmpfile_safer (I think tmpfile > is not that safe due to signals and whatnot), so I split the fopen-safer > module into two, as follows: Can you expand on why tmpfile is not so safe? -- Ben Pfaff email: address@hidden web: http://benpfaff.org
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |