[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: split stdio-safer into fopen-safer, tmpfile-safer
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: split stdio-safer into fopen-safer, tmpfile-safer |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Jul 2006 21:42:09 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
According to Ben Pfaff on 7/26/2006 11:54 AM:
> Eric Blake <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> According to Ben Pfaff on 7/25/2006 11:21 AM:
>>> Can you expand on why tmpfile is not so safe?
>> I'd still like to fear Paul's reasons.
>
> I hope you mean "hear" them :-)
A rather humorous typo on my part, in retrospect. Sorry for the confusion.
> I was worried that there was something bigger here. Usually a
> "safety" issue is something more important than leaving a
> temporary file undeleted or limiting their number, like the
> possibility of a security hole, a segfault, etc.
Not that I'm aware of.
- --
Life is short - so eat dessert first!
Eric Blake address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEyDYR84KuGfSFAYARAmHMAJ9kOuKOUGzEB+E/l1yvDHIfyzwxxgCgrhL9
MGygCbDuGK3K0qOncwyxqpo=
=ezWw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- split stdio-safer into fopen-safer, tmpfile-safer, Paul Eggert, 2006/07/25
- Re: split stdio-safer into fopen-safer, tmpfile-safer, Eric Blake, 2006/07/25
- Re: split stdio-safer into fopen-safer, tmpfile-safer, Ben Pfaff, 2006/07/25
- Re: split stdio-safer into fopen-safer, tmpfile-safer, Eric Blake, 2006/07/25
- Re: [bug-gnulib] split stdio-safer into fopen-safer, tmpfile-safer, Bruno Haible, 2006/07/26
- Re: split stdio-safer into fopen-safer, tmpfile-safer, Ben Pfaff, 2006/07/26
- Re: split stdio-safer into fopen-safer, tmpfile-safer,
Eric Blake <=
- Re: split stdio-safer into fopen-safer, tmpfile-safer, Paul Eggert, 2006/07/27
- Re: purpose of *-safer?, Bruno Haible, 2006/07/25
- Re: purpose of *-safer?, Paul Eggert, 2006/07/27
- Re: purpose of *-safer?, Jim Meyering, 2006/07/27
Re: split stdio-safer into fopen-safer, tmpfile-safer, Eric Blake, 2006/07/28