|
From: | Paul Eggert |
Subject: | Re: split stdio-safer into fopen-safer, tmpfile-safer |
Date: | Thu, 27 Jul 2006 02:56:32 -0400 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Eric Blake <address@hidden> writes: > Would you accept a similar patch that splits out pipe-safer into its own > module instead of part of unistd-safer? I think that'd be OK, yes. It sounds pretty straightforward, anyway.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |