[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Aug 2006 21:21:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
* Bruno Haible wrote on Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 08:00:57PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > This should only be an error if `missing' cannot guess the output file
> > name. The fix is to use the flag -o or --output, to help `missing' to
> > infer.
>
> And what about the cross-compiling case? 'help2man' bails out with an error
> if you have modified src/hello.c when cross-compiling:
Good question. We could ask help2man to have it return a different exit
status if it gets an exit status of 126 from the program, and have it
return 63 then, which `missing' will interpret as version mismatch.
A downside may be that program files that aren't executable will cause
this too, then. Those may be produced either by user error (forgot to
"chmod +x" a script) or by a failed link on some system (the HP-UX
linker may create such, for example; it's an open issue to fix this
consistently in the Autotools, the most difficult question being where
to fix this).
I can take this to bug-help2man if we can agree on proposing the change.
Cheers,
Ralf
- Re: hello 2.1.91 pretest, (continued)
- hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X, Bruno Haible, 2006/08/22
- Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/08/22
- Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/08/24
- Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X, Simon Josefsson, 2006/08/24
- Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/08/24
- Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X, Simon Josefsson, 2006/08/24
- Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X, Bruno Haible, 2006/08/24
Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X, Karl Berry, 2006/08/23