[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:44:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.1 |
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> First, I think you wouldn't want `make' to keep trying to update
> hello.1
Well, if HELP2MAN is the command ':' that doesn't eat CPU time, it doesn't
matter.
> so a rule like
> if test '$(cross_compiling)' = yes
The value of $cross_compiling can also be 'maybe'. To be safe, I think
it's better to compare it via != no
Bruno
- Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X, (continued)
- Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/08/22
- Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X, Bruno Haible, 2006/08/23
- Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/08/23
- Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X, Bruno Haible, 2006/08/23
- Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X, Karl Berry, 2006/08/23
- Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X, Bruno Haible, 2006/08/24
- Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/08/24
- Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X, Simon Josefsson, 2006/08/24
- Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/08/24
- Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X, Simon Josefsson, 2006/08/24
- Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X,
Bruno Haible <=
Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X, Karl Berry, 2006/08/23
- Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/08/24
- Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X, Karl Berry, 2006/08/24
- Re: hello-2.1.91 and CR/LF, Bruno Haible, 2006/08/25
- Re: hello-2.1.91 and CR/LF, Karl Berry, 2006/08/25
- Re: hello-2.1.91 and CR/LF, Bruno Haible, 2006/08/25
Re: hello-2.1.91 and CR/LF, Karl Berry, 2006/08/28
Re: hello-2.1.91 and CR/LF, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/08/29
Re: hello-2.1.91 and CR/LF, Karl Berry, 2006/08/29
Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X, Bruno Haible, 2006/08/24