[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:40:44 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
On 01/14/11 11:40, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote:
> Have you found a solution that satisfies you?
I thought the idea was to add an option when
building, to rename (e.g.,) zcat to gzcat.
I don't recall any urgency to doing this; obviously,
any solution we come up with will take some time
to propagate, and in the meantime zutils should have
a solution for dealing with gzip 1.4 and earlier.
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2011/01/02
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2011/01/14
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2011/01/15
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Paul Eggert, 2011/01/15
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2011/01/16
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Paul Eggert, 2011/01/16
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2011/01/17
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Paul Eggert, 2011/01/17
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2011/01/18
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Paul Eggert, 2011/01/18
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2011/01/18
Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Matias A. Fonzo, 2011/01/20