[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities
|
From: |
Paul Eggert |
|
Subject: |
Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities |
|
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:22:37 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
On 01/17/2011 11:05 AM, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote:
> IMHO this problem is already solved.
If you're right, then there is no rush in changing gzip.
If memory serves, we were going to add a configure-time flag
to change the program names from z* to gz*, which sounds
reasonable, when someone gets around to it.
You might also consider what changes are needed to the FHS,
since it seems to be incompatible with what's being proposed.
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2011/01/02
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2011/01/14
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Paul Eggert, 2011/01/14
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2011/01/15
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Paul Eggert, 2011/01/15
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2011/01/16
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Paul Eggert, 2011/01/16
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2011/01/17
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2011/01/18
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Paul Eggert, 2011/01/18
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2011/01/18
Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Matias A. Fonzo, 2011/01/20