[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities
From: |
Matias A. Fonzo |
Subject: |
Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:42:17 -0300 (ART) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.15 |
Hi there,
Paul Eggert wrote:
>> If memory serves, we were going to add a configure-time flag
>> to change the program names from z* to gz*, which sounds
>> reasonable, when someone gets around to it.
>
> Exactly.
> Is that a change you could write? That would help move things along,
> I expect.
How do you expect?.
The whole operation can be performed using the option
`--program-transform-name=' passed to `configure'. For example, to rename
gzip-only scripts including the manpages, we can type:
./configure --prefix=/usr --program-transform-name='s/^z/g&/'
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, (continued)
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Paul Eggert, 2011/01/14
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2011/01/15
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Paul Eggert, 2011/01/15
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2011/01/16
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Paul Eggert, 2011/01/16
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2011/01/17
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Paul Eggert, 2011/01/17
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2011/01/18
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Paul Eggert, 2011/01/18
- Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2011/01/18
Re: Zutils vs single compressor utilities,
Matias A. Fonzo <=