Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

bug-mailutils (thread)

[Date Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Thu Feb 28 2002 18:59:32 -0500 Threads in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• Does mail need to disable dependencies?, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/27
• Why use fcntl to unlock a file before unlinking it?, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/24
  • Re: Why use fcntl to unlock a file before unlinking it?, Alain Magloire, 2002/02/24
  • Message not available
    • Re: Why use fcntl to unlock a file before unlinking it?, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/24
  • Message not available
    • Re: Why use fcntl to unlock a file before unlinking it?, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/25
• Mailutils configuration, some work needed, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/23
  • Re: Mailutils configuration, some work needed, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/23
    • Re: Mailutils configuration, some work needed, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/23
      • Re: Mailutils configuration, some work needed, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/24
      • Re: Mailutils configuration, some work needed, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/27
      • Re: Mailutils configuration, some work needed, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/28
      • Re: Mailutils configuration, some work needed, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/28
      • Re: Mailutils configuration, some work needed, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/28
• °¡ÀÔÇϸé 5000Á¡!°¡°ÝÈïÁ¤ °¡´ÉÇÑ ¼îÇθô!![±¤°í], ÀÌ¿¬Á¤, 2002/02/23
• Why do you want to increment *argc in argcv.c?, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/22
  • Re: Why do you want to increment *argc in argcv.c?, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/23
  • Re: Why do you want to increment *argc in argcv.c?, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/23
    • Re: Why do you want to increment *argc in argcv.c?, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/23
      • Re: Why do you want to increment *argc in argcv.c?, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/23
      • Re: Why do you want to increment *argc in argcv.c?, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/23
      • Re: Why do you want to increment *argc in argcv.c?, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/23
• SCO now builds without assistance, Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/21
• doc installation on debian - special?, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/21
  • Re: doc installation on debian - special?, Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/21
    • Re: doc installation on debian - special?, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/21
      • Re: doc installation on debian - special?, Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/21
      • argcv.c, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/22
      • Re: argcv.c, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/22
      • imap4d_DEPENDENCIES, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/22
      • Re: imap4d_DEPENDENCIES, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/22
  • Re: doc installation on debian - special?, Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/21
• ENOTSUP not in SCO =(, Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/20
  • Re: ENOTSUP not in SCO =(, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/21
    • Re: ENOTSUP not in SCO =(, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/21
• Curses vs. Ncruses for readline?, Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/20
  • Re: Curses vs. Ncruses for readline?, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/21
• Re: new mailbox stuff, Alain Magloire, 2002/02/20
  • Re: new mailbox stuff, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/20
    • Re: new mailbox stuff, Nic Ferrier, 2002/02/21
      • Re: new mailbox stuff, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/21
  • Re: new mailbox stuff, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/21
    • Re: new mailbox stuff, Alain Magloire, 2002/02/24
• bug in imap status command, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/20
  • Re: bug in imap status command, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/20
• strange things in the build, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/18
  • Re: strange things in the build, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/18
    • Re: strange things in the build, Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/18
      • Re: strange things in the build, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/18
      • Re: strange things in the build, Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/18
      • Re: strange things in the build - NOT hallucinating, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/19
      • Re: strange things in the build - NOT hallucinating, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/20
      • Re: strange things in the build - NOT hallucinating, Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/20
• SCO Openserver -> Success, Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/18
• PAM?, Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/18
• mh, Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/18
  • Re: mh, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/18
    • Re: mh, Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/24
      • Re: mh, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/24
  • MH, Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/20
    • Re: MH, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/21
• address@hidden: Bug#126755: mailutils-doc: Missing function prototypes], Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/17
  • Re: address@hidden: Bug#126755: mailutils-doc: Missing function prototypes], Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/18
• address@hidden: Bug#134330: mailutils-imap4d: Infinite loop on symlinks.], Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/16
  • Re: address@hidden: Bug#134330: mailutils-imap4d: Infinite loop on symlinks.], Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/17
    • Re: address@hidden: Bug#134330: mailutils-imap4d: Infinite loop on symlinks.], Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/17
  • Re: [Infinite loop on symlinks.] don't we need to check the dev?, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/17
    • Re: [Infinite loop on symlinks.] don't we need to check the dev?, Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/17
    • Re: [Infinite loop on symlinks.] don't we need to check the dev?, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/17
  • imap4d - feature request :-), Sam Roberts, 2002/02/20
    • Re: imap4d - feature request :-), Nic Ferrier, 2002/02/21
      • Re: imap4d - feature request :-), Sam Roberts, 2002/02/21
      • Re: imap4d - feature request :-), Nic Ferrier, 2002/02/21
      • Re: imap4d - feature request :-), Alain Magloire, 2002/02/21
    • Re: imap4d - feature request :-), Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/21
      • Re: imap4d - feature request :-), Sam Roberts, 2002/02/21
      • Re: imap4d - feature request :-), Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/21
      • Re: imap4d - feature request :-), Nic Ferrier, 2002/02/21
      • Re: imap4d - feature request :-), Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/22
      • mail, just doesn't seem to work for me!, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/23
      • Re: mail, just doesn't seem to work for me!, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/23
      • Re: mail, just doesn't seem to work for me!, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/23
      • Re: mail, just doesn't seem to work for me!, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/23
      • Re: mail, just doesn't seem to work for me!, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/23
      • Re: mail, just doesn't seem to work for me!, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/23
• Latest configure changes have broken my build., Sam Roberts, 2002/02/15
  • Re: Latest configure changes have broken my build., Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/16
  • Re: Latest configure changes have broken my build., Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/16
    • Re: Latest configure changes have broken my build., Sam Roberts, 2002/02/16
      • Re: Latest configure changes have broken my build., Sam Roberts, 2002/02/16
      • Re: Latest configure changes have broken my build., Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/16
      • Re: Latest configure changes have broken my build., Sam Roberts, 2002/02/16
      • Re: Latest configure changes have broken my build., Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/16
      • Re: Latest configure changes have broken my build., Sam Roberts, 2002/02/16
      • Re: Latest configure changes have broken my build., Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/16
      • Re: Latest configure changes have broken my build., Sam Roberts, 2002/02/16
      • Re: Latest configure changes have broken my build., Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/16
      • Re: Latest configure changes have broken my build., Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/18
• Re: (no subject), Sam Roberts, 2002/02/14
  • Re: (no subject), Steven Michael ROBBINS, 2002/02/24
    • Re: (no subject), Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/24
      • Re: (no subject), Steven Michael ROBBINS, 2002/02/24
      • Re: (no subject), Sam Roberts, 2002/02/24
• Compilation on SCO, Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/13
  • Re: Compilation on SCO, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/14
    • Re: Compilation on SCO, Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/15
      • Re: Compilation on SCO, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/16
• GSSAPI in imap?, Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/11
  • Re: GSSAPI in imap?, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/02/12
• error numbers.... a continuing pain, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/08
  • Re: error numbers.... a continuing pain, Jeff Bailey, 2002/02/09
  • Re: error numbers.... a continuing pain, Alain Magloire, 2002/02/10
• imap and pop mailboxes don't need to be opened?!, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/08
  • Re: imap and pop mailboxes don't need to be opened?!, Alain Magloire, 2002/02/08
  • Message not available
    • Re: imap and pop mailboxes don't need to be opened?!, Sam Roberts, 2002/02/09

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc