[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [chicken-users] silex GPL-2 licensed?
From: |
felix winkelmann |
Subject: |
Re: [chicken-users] silex GPL-2 licensed? |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:30:48 +0100 |
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Leonardo Valeri Manera
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Why is silex GPL-2 now?
>
> This screws it up for everyone making non-GPL-2 stuff that uses
> easyffi or one of the many eggs that depend on it...
>
The original code had an unknown license. The current version as
available on the 'net is GPL, AFAIK.
Since easyffi is purely compile-time, I see no reason why it should
infect code compiled with it with GPL licensing. Can some license
advocate clarify this?
cheers,
felix
- [chicken-users] silex GPL-2 licensed?, Leonardo Valeri Manera, 2008/03/18
- Re: [chicken-users] silex GPL-2 licensed?, John Cowan, 2008/03/18
- Re: [chicken-users] silex GPL-2 licensed?,
felix winkelmann <=
- Re: [chicken-users] silex GPL-2 licensed?, John Cowan, 2008/03/19
- Re: [chicken-users] silex GPL-2 licensed?, Leonardo Valeri Manera, 2008/03/19
- Re: [chicken-users] silex GPL-2 licensed?, John Cowan, 2008/03/19
- Re: [chicken-users] silex GPL-2 licensed?, minh thu, 2008/03/19
- Re: [chicken-users] silex GPL-2 licensed?, John Cowan, 2008/03/19
- Re: [chicken-users] silex GPL-2 licensed?, Jim Ursetto, 2008/03/19
- Re: [chicken-users] silex GPL-2 licensed?, John Cowan, 2008/03/20
- Re: [chicken-users] silex GPL-2 licensed?, Jim Ursetto, 2008/03/20
- Re: [chicken-users] silex GPL-2 licensed?, felix winkelmann, 2008/03/20
- Re: [chicken-users] silex GPL-2 licensed?, Leonardo Valeri Manera, 2008/03/20