Re: [chicken-users] silex GPL-2 licensed?

[felix winkelmann]

On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Jim Ursetto <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 3/19/08, John Cowan <address@hidden> wrote:
>  > Jim Ursetto scripsit:
>
> > > Does this mean fp is now GPL?
>
>  > Yes, it is, or rather it would be if the copy of silex.scm in the silex egg
>  > were under the GPL. But it is not; there is neither copyright nor license
>  > anywhere on it.  As I said before, it is "use at your own risk."
>
>  Good.  May I suggest then that the license on the silex egg be returned to 
> its
>  previous status ("Other") and that, if we do need to incorporate GPLed code
>  from a newer version, a new egg be created.
>
>  If that isn't doable, I'll host a frozen version of the egg with the
>  original license.
>

Ok, I'll revert the change. Apologies for causing confusion.


cheers,
felix