[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The New GNUstep Seems Slow
From: |
Richard Frith-Macdonald |
Subject: |
Re: The New GNUstep Seems Slow |
Date: |
Fri, 6 May 2011 09:29:45 +0100 |
On 6 May 2011, at 08:38, Fred Kiefer wrote:
> Great! Now what should we do about this? Release a bug fix for back? That way
> we would have a different version number for back and the corresponding gui.
> But will this cause any harm?
I know we practically always have gui and back versions in sync, but there's no
reason that their subminor version numbers shouldn't differ.
After all ... that's what the subminor version number is for (bugfixe releases
which don't break binary compatibility).
- Re: The New GNUstep Seems Slow, Fred Kiefer, 2011/05/05
- Re: The New GNUstep Seems Slow, Eric Wasylishen, 2011/05/05
- Re: The New GNUstep Seems Slow, Fred Kiefer, 2011/05/05
- Re: The New GNUstep Seems Slow, Richard Stonehouse, 2011/05/05
- Re: The New GNUstep Seems Slow, Fred Kiefer, 2011/05/06
- Re: The New GNUstep Seems Slow, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2011/05/06
- Re: The New GNUstep Seems Slow,
Richard Frith-Macdonald <=
- Re: The New GNUstep Seems Slow, Sebastian Reitenbach, 2011/05/06
- Re: The New GNUstep Seems Slow, Eric Wasylishen, 2011/05/06
- Re: The New GNUstep Seems Slow, Adam Fedor, 2011/05/06
- Re: The New GNUstep Seems Slow, Fred Kiefer, 2011/05/07