Re: The New GNUstep Seems Slow

[Adam Fedor]

On May 6, 2011, at 1:49 PM, Eric Wasylishen wrote:

> On 2011-05-06, at 1:38 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote:
> 
>> Great! Now what should we do about this? Release a bug fix for back? That 
>> way we would have a different version number for back and the corresponding 
>> gui. But will this cause any harm?
>> 
>> With all the great changes from Eric in gui we should only do a new full 
>> release after completing that change cycle. I would expect that this take up 
>> at least two more months. An intermediate bug fix release sounds 
>> appropriate. 
>> 
>> Fred
> 
> I think doing a bug fix release makes sense. It would be r32849 (Version 
> 0.20.0) with r32986 and r32987 applied (I made a first attempt at fixing the 
> bug in r32986 which I didn't like and undid in r32987).
> 
> I don't see a problem with having gui at 0.20.0 and back at 0.20.1.
> 

I've branched the back 0.20.0 release and I can make bug fix release anytime if 
you'd like.  Just let me know.