Re: The New GNUstep Seems Slow

[Fred Kiefer]

Fine by me.

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Fri, 6 May 2011 14:15:46 -0600
> Von: Adam Fedor <fedor@gnu.org>
> An: Discuss GNUstep <discuss-gnustep@gnu.org>
> CC: Fred Kiefer <fredkiefer@gmx.de>
> Betreff: Re: The New GNUstep Seems Slow

> 
> On May 6, 2011, at 1:49 PM, Eric Wasylishen wrote:
> 
> > On 2011-05-06, at 1:38 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote:
> > 
> >> Great! Now what should we do about this? Release a bug fix for back?
> That way we would have a different version number for back and the
> corresponding gui. But will this cause any harm?
> >> 
> >> With all the great changes from Eric in gui we should only do a new
> full release after completing that change cycle. I would expect that this take
> up at least two more months. An intermediate bug fix release sounds
> appropriate. 
> >> 
> >> Fred
> > 
> > I think doing a bug fix release makes sense. It would be r32849 (Version
> 0.20.0) with r32986 and r32987 applied (I made a first attempt at fixing
> the bug in r32986 which I didn't like and undid in r32987).
> > 
> > I don't see a problem with having gui at 0.20.0 and back at 0.20.1.
> > 
> 
> I've branched the back 0.20.0 release and I can make bug fix release
> anytime if you'd like.  Just let me know.