[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[DotGNU]Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility
From: |
Norbert Bollow |
Subject: |
[DotGNU]Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Jul 2001 08:26:46 +0200 |
Tali Streit <address@hidden>
> Instead i think that we should *strongly* push ourselves as creating
> something far superior to .NET. not even something based on it.
Yes. I agree 100%.
At the same time there are those who are adopting .NET because
the boss say they must, even if they hate Microsoft. It's
important to let them know that DotGNU will be
_downward_compatible_ to .NET
> this way we are saying that .NET is not worth copying, but something
> needs to be done.
Don't forget to mention that because of the way in which
Microsoft is strategically placing itself in the center of the
.NET universe, .NET can only solve part of the problem that it
promises to solve. DotGNU has come to solve that problem fully
and even go beyond it.
Greetings, Norbert.
--
Norbert Bollow, Weidlistr.18, CH-8624 Gruet (near Zurich, Switzerland)
Your own domain with all your Mailman lists: $15/month http://cisto.com
Business Coaching for Internet Entrepreneurs ---> http://thinkcoach.com
Tel +41 1 972 20 59 Fax +41 1 972 20 69 address@hidden
- [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU), (continued)
- [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU), Norbert Bollow, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU), David Sugar, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU), Norbert Bollow, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU), Adam Theo, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU), tali streit, 2001/07/19
- Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Bradley M. Kuhn, 2001/07/22
- Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Bradley M. Kuhn, 2001/07/22
- Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), tali streit, 2001/07/23
- Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 2001/07/23
- [DotGNU]Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility, tali streit, 2001/07/23
- [DotGNU]Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility,
Norbert Bollow <=
- Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Jeremy Petzold, 2001/07/23
- Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Bradley M. Kuhn, 2001/07/24
- Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), tali streit, 2001/07/25
- Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Jeremy Petzold, 2001/07/25
- Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Charles Iliya Krempeaux, 2001/07/25
- Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Bradley M. Kuhn, 2001/07/31
- Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Norbert Bollow, 2001/07/31
- Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 2001/07/23
- Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Adam Theo, 2001/07/23
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Martin Coxall, 2001/07/18