[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice
From: |
Norbert Bollow |
Subject: |
Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)) |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Jul 2001 16:10:27 +0200 |
Bradley M. Kuhn <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > how about "DotGNU is a network orientated framework with an emphasis
> > > on freedom and privacy. DotGNU is backwardly compatible with MS .NET"
>
> I see no problem saying it this way, as long as we make it clear and
> certain that DotGNU will be compatible with Microsoft.NET. The GNU system
> is compatible with Unix, but has enhancements that don't break
> compatibility. DotGNU should certainly do the same.
Absolutely - at least to the extent that it is possible to do so
without violating ethical principles and without doing things
that come dangerously close to stuff that Microsoft has been
granted patents for.
Greetings, Norbert.
--
A member of FreeDevelopers and the DotGNU Core Team http://dotgnu.org
Norbert Bollow, Weidlistr.18, CH-8624 Gruet (near Zurich, Switzerland)
Tel +41 1 972 20 59 Fax +41 1 972 20 69 http://thinkcoach.com
Your own domain with all your Mailman lists: $15/month http://cisto.com
- Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), (continued)
- [DotGNU]Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility, Norbert Bollow, 2001/07/23
- Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Jeremy Petzold, 2001/07/23
- Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Bradley M. Kuhn, 2001/07/24
- Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), tali streit, 2001/07/25
- Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Jeremy Petzold, 2001/07/25
- Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Charles Iliya Krempeaux, 2001/07/25
- Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Bradley M. Kuhn, 2001/07/31
- Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)),
Norbert Bollow <=
- Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 2001/07/23
- Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Adam Theo, 2001/07/23
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Martin Coxall, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Barry Fitzgerald, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Kent Nguyen, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Martin Coxall, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Kent Nguyen, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Martin Coxall, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Adam Theo, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Norbert Bollow, 2001/07/18