[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Incompatible change without "warning"
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Incompatible change without "warning" |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Apr 2005 22:09:59 +0300 |
> From: Frank Schmitt <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:48:45 +0200
>
> I see that on 2005-4-18 the tooltip-use-echo-area was renamed to
> tooltip-gud-echo-area. This change breaks existing code
> (semantic). Isn't it common practise to first deprecate a variable
> before deleting it?
I think we should introduce a defvaralias, so as not to break existing
code.
> And shouldn't this make it into NEWS?
Definitely.
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", (continued)
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Lute Kamstra, 2005/04/21
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Richard Stallman, 2005/04/23
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Nick Roberts, 2005/04/26
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Stefan Monnier, 2005/04/26
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Nick Roberts, 2005/04/26
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Stefan Monnier, 2005/04/26
Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Richard Stallman, 2005/04/20
Incompatible change without "warning", Nick Roberts, 2005/04/19
Re: Incompatible change without "warning",
Eli Zaretskii <=