[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Incompatible change without "warning"
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: Incompatible change without "warning" |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Apr 2005 21:15:52 +1200 |
> I see XEmacs has
> define-obsolete-function-alias so we could do:
>
> Compatibility adds an additional reason.
> So please add define-obsolete-function-alias.
> Please give it arguments compatible with XEmacs.
I have added define-obsolete-function-alias to byte-run.el
I have not provided documentation because I would like guidance:
Me> These two functions are so similar to the two that I've just documented,
Me> externally at least, that I wonder if they could be described somewhere
Me> centrally in the Lisp manual i.e a link from the nodes 'Defining
Me> Variables' and 'Defining Functions'to one called 'Obsoletion'.
The current documentation for these related functions uses different argument
names which I think is confusing:
Manual:
- Function: defvaralias alias-var base-var &optional docstring
Documentation string:
(defvaralias symbol aliased &optional docstring)
Shall I change these to
Manual:
- Function: defvaralias variable new &optional docstring
Documentation string:
(defvaralias variable new &optional docstring)
for consistency with make-obsolete-variable, define-obsolete-variable-alias?
The manual says:
`string-to-int' is an obsolete alias for this function. (string-to-number)
but string-to-int has not been made obsolete.
Some variables/functions have been obsolete since 19.15. Is now a good time
to purge them?
Nick
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", (continued)
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Nick Roberts, 2005/04/23
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Eli Zaretskii, 2005/04/23
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Lute Kamstra, 2005/04/23
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Richard Stallman, 2005/04/21
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Nick Roberts, 2005/04/21
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Lute Kamstra, 2005/04/21
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Richard Stallman, 2005/04/23
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning",
Nick Roberts <=
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Stefan Monnier, 2005/04/26
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Nick Roberts, 2005/04/26
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Stefan Monnier, 2005/04/26
Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Richard Stallman, 2005/04/20
Incompatible change without "warning", Nick Roberts, 2005/04/19
Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Eli Zaretskii, 2005/04/19