[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Incompatible change without "warning"
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: Incompatible change without "warning" |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Apr 2005 12:56:47 +1200 |
> I should also add that tooltip-gud-echo-area doesn't do exactly the
> same thing as tooltip-use-echo-area: it only uses the echo area for
> GUD tooltips. Help messages are still displayed in their own
> tooltip frame. Previously using the echo area for GUD tooltips
> required help messages to be displayed there also. Turning
> tooltip-mode off means that help messages displayed in the echo
> area and that GUD tooltips are no longer displayed. Maybe this
> change is not as good as I first thought because now it is not
> possible to have both GUD tooltips and help messages displayed in
> the echo area.
>
> Why did you make that change? It would seem that if people prefer to
> have GUD tooltip texts displayed in the echo area, they most likely
> also want help messages displayed there.
When tooltip-mode is off help messages are displayed in the echo area. It was
confusing and a bit redundant that tooltip-mode turned on and
tooltip-use-echo-area set to t would also display help messages there.
GUD tooltips are generated differently to normal tooltips whose message are
embedded in the text properties. Their display is more erratic and thats why
I thought it might help to display them in the echo area.
There are six cases to consider:
Normal
Own Frame | Echo Area Behaviours
None x x x - previous and present
G
U Own frame x * - previous
D
Echo area + * + - present
The asymmetry arises becauses help messages can't be suppressed like
GUD tooltips. I don't think an extra variable to deal with the extra
case is justified. I can revert the change if people prefer the old
behaviour/can't think of a more elegant solution.
As an aside, at some stage in the future I would like to extend GUD tooltips
to display #define directives over identifiers (like in Visual Studio, I
think) when the program is not executing.
Nick
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", (continued)
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Nick Roberts, 2005/04/21
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Lute Kamstra, 2005/04/21
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Richard Stallman, 2005/04/23
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Nick Roberts, 2005/04/26
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Stefan Monnier, 2005/04/26
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Nick Roberts, 2005/04/26
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Stefan Monnier, 2005/04/26
Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Richard Stallman, 2005/04/20
Incompatible change without "warning", Nick Roberts, 2005/04/19
Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Eli Zaretskii, 2005/04/19