[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can we go GTK-only?
From: |
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu |
Subject: |
Re: Can we go GTK-only? |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Nov 2016 14:00:49 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (Shijō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
>>>>> On Tue, 01 Nov 2016 22:42:27 +0200, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> said:
>> Emacs today can tolerate arbitrary memory allocations off the main
>> thread after dumping using the system heap. I know this to be case
>> because Emacs today, on the most common platforms --- OS X,
>> GNU/Linux, and Windows, all perform allocations off the main thread
>> in very common configurations _already_.
> The only platform I know about that starts non-main threads which
> run Emacs application code is MS-Windows, and there we don't
> allocate anything off the heap, at least not off the same heap that
> is used by the main (Lisp) thread.
The font backend driver macfont.m imported from the Mac port does
deallocation off the main thread for some data that were allocated in
the main thread.
1489 dispatch_group_async (group, queue, ^{
1490 int nkeys;
1491 uintptr_t key;
1492 nkeys = nkeys_or_perm;
1493 for (key = row * (256 / NGLYPHS_IN_VALUE); ; key++)
1494 if (CFDictionaryContainsKey (dictionary,
1495 (const void *) key))
1496 {
1497 CFDictionaryRemoveValue (dictionary,
1498 (const void *) key);
1499 if (--nkeys == 0)
1500 break;
1501 }
1502 });
I can disable this for NS if it does not fit with the current policy
of GNU Emacs mainline source code.
(You can find more use cases of threads via libdispatch in the Mac
port. Even basic drawings are done off the main thread.)
Of course, external libraries would do memory allocation/deallocation
across the threads behind the scenes.
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
address@hidden
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, (continued)
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/01
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/01
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Daniel Colascione, 2016/11/01
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/01
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/01
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Daniel Colascione, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?,
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <=
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/03
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/01
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Nikolaus Rath, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Paul Eggert, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Nikolaus Rath, 2016/11/02