[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can we go GTK-only?
From: |
Daniel Colascione |
Subject: |
Re: Can we go GTK-only? |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Nov 2016 08:55:24 -0700 |
User-agent: |
K-9 Mail for Android |
On November 2, 2016 8:49:30 AM PDT, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 22:26:06 -0400
>> From: "Perry E. Metzger" <address@hidden>
>> Cc: Daniel Colascione <address@hidden>, address@hidden,
>> address@hidden, address@hidden
>>
>> > > You categorically stated that memory allocation off the main
>> > > thread is unsafe.
>> >
>> > No, I didn't.
>>
>> You were saying platforms exist where Emacs runs and malloc() is not
>> thread safe mere hours ago.
>
>No, I said some of them had thread-related bugs reported as recently
>as few years ago. Which means they only recently became or are
>becoming mature enough.
>
>> However, might we take this as meaning that you now agree that
>> malloc() is indeed thread safe?
>
>Theoretically, yes. In practice, see above.
In practice it's safe as well. Nobody else is developing software under the
assumption that libc malloc is not thread safe.
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, (continued)
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/01
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/01
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Daniel Colascione, 2016/11/01
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/01
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/01
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?,
Daniel Colascione <=
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/03
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/01
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Nikolaus Rath, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Paul Eggert, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/02