[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can we go GTK-only?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Can we go GTK-only? |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Nov 2016 20:27:49 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
> I was not talking about multithreading in general. I was talking
> specifically about Emacs, its coding practices, and its particular
> design and needs wrt memory allocation. I named several factors that
OK, so we agree that Emacs can assume that on any system where we can
use multithreading we can assume that the system's malloc will work just
right. So the only potential difficulties come from Emacs itself,
i.e. things over which *we* have control.
Stefan
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, (continued)
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/01
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Daniel Colascione, 2016/11/01
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/01
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/01
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Daniel Colascione, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/03
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Nikolaus Rath, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Paul Eggert, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Nikolaus Rath, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, John Wiegley, 2016/11/03
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, John Wiegley, 2016/11/03