[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can we go GTK-only?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Can we go GTK-only? |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Nov 2016 22:13:13 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 12:04:48 -0400
>
> > "Should", not "will". And on some systems, only with very recent
> > library versions.
>
> Again: which system are you think of that's had a buggy
> malloc-with-threads in the last, say, ten years?
Even glibc had a bug. And one or 2 of *BSDs.
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, (continued)
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/01
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Nikolaus Rath, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Paul Eggert, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Nikolaus Rath, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, John Wiegley, 2016/11/03
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, John Wiegley, 2016/11/03