Re: Can we go GTK-only?

[John Wiegley]

>>>>> "EZ" == Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

PM> You've explicitly refused to name an exception, and no one else is
PM> aware of one, so how can we give credence to your claim?

EZ> As for "claims": this is more about gut feelings, based on the factors I
EZ> mentioned, than about anything else. It is OK to disagree with gut
EZ> feelings, even if you agree with the facts. It is NOT okay to make this a
EZ> discussion about my credibility. If my credibility is being questioned, I
EZ> will simply step down.

Please do not discourage our co-maintainer by speaking disrespectfully on this
mailing list!!! Those who do so will be moderated out of the discussion. I'd
much rather have Eli stick around, than see a minor technical point championed
at the expense of one of our most stalwart contributors.

To everyone: If you can't phrase your disagreements and observations in calm,
rational language, then please refrain. We should be speaking to each other as
though we were what we are: computer professionals who know what we're doing,
and who all want Emacs to succeed.

Claims backed up by data argue well here; attacking the position or
credibility of others not only fails to win the point, it loses big on morale,
which is much more precious commodity. We're a small community; there is no
need for this.

Eli, please do not step down. You are my ray of light against a dark sea of
never-ending bug reports.

-- 
John Wiegley                  GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com                          60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature