Re: Towards a cleaner build

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 06:29:51 +0200
> Cc: address@hidden
> 
> >     (defun display-completion-list (completions &optional common-substring)
> >       [...]
> >       (declare (advertised-calling-convention (completions) "24.4"))
> 
> Oh, I see.  So should we just remove the optional argument now -- 24.4
> was in...  2011?

I'd prefer if we made the byte-compiler warnings smarter in this
case.  It shouldn't behave like we are shooting ourselves in the foot
in these cases.

Do we have a means to tell the byte-compiler "don't emit this specific
warning for that function"?  If not, perhaps we should.