[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Towards a cleaner build
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Towards a cleaner build |
Date: |
Fri, 17 May 2019 11:37:37 +0300 |
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 08:12:41 +0200
>
> > Do we have a means to tell the byte-compiler "don't emit this specific
> > warning for that function"? If not, perhaps we should.
>
> Yes, that would be very nice. Perhaps a general er form? Like...
>
> (without-byte-compilation-warnings
> ...)
>
> Hm, that's perhaps too general. What about:
>
> (without-byte-compilation-warning 'callargs
> ...)
I thought about something even more focused, like
(declare 'warning-about-arguments-mismatch 'off)
inside the function's body.
- Re: Towards a cleaner build: epa-mail, (continued)
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/05/16
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/05/16
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, Stefan Monnier, 2019/05/17
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/05/17
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/05/17
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/05/17
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/05/17
- Re: Towards a cleaner build,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/05/17
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, Noam Postavsky, 2019/05/17
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/05/17
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, Stefan Monnier, 2019/05/17
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/05/18
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/05/17
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/05/17
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/05/17
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/05/17
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/05/17