Re: Towards a cleaner build

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Noam Postavsky <address@hidden> writes:

>> (defun foo ()
>>   (with-suppressed-warnings (obsolete foo)
>>     ...))
>>
>> That seems like a rather drastic way of doing it, I think?
>
> Why do you say that?

It introduces another progn level...  Perhaps that doesn't matter?  Or
is removed by the compiler?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no