Re: Towards a cleaner build

[Stefan Monnier]

>> +  ;; The implementation for the interpreter is basically trivial.
>> +  `(with-suppressed-warnings-1 ',warnings (progn ,@body)))
> A comment here on why we need both a function and macro would be
> useful (or is it possible to have this work with just a macro?)

Indeed, for the interpreter the implementation should be like that of
with-no-warnings, just dropping the `warnings` argument altogether.


        Stefan