Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp

[Christopher Miles]

Leo Liu <sdl.web@gmail.com> writes:

> On 2021-01-15 14:09 +0200, Dmitry Gutov wrote:
>> Consider that, when a piece of code is implemented in Lisp, it's
>> easier for us "mere mortals" to find it, read, understand and debug
>> it. Even more so when it comes to people outside of emacs-devel.
>
> Eli is not against more elisp. In fact he encourages it.
>
> His principle is for C code that has been there for decades and is _not_
> broken let us be cautious and make a clear case before moving it to
> elisp.
>
> There could only be good things following this principle.

If don't move this, then there is same reason to don't more others. Then don't
change any C code which existed for a long time. So the result is don't touch
any C code.... A reason like existing for decade time is not a reasonable
argument. Should talking technically.

An old house existing for decades, should not update it.... because it exists
decades. We should talk about why update it. And Dmitry Gutov and Stefa gives
clear reason. But you didn't give technical reason. So I think it's not really
arguing correctly. Really should stop this.

-- 
[ stardiviner ]
       I try to make every word tell the meaning that I want to express.

       Blog: https://stardiviner.github.io/
       IRC(freenode): stardiviner, Matrix: stardiviner
       GPG: F09F650D7D674819892591401B5DF1C95AE89AC3

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature