[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.
From: |
Jean Louis |
Subject: |
Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Jan 2021 13:53:36 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.0 (3d08634) (2020-11-07) |
* Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> [2021-01-24 09:36]:
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
> > > What role do these particular schemas play in the standard?
> > > Are they examples? Are they used by the standards documents?
>
> > It's not entirely clear to me if they're considered part of the
> > standard.
>
> It sounds like they are either examples or part of the standard
> and we cannot tell which. Is that right?
Schemas are attached.
I see copyright notices inside and it appears to be fully free
document modifiable and distributable as long as copyrights remains.
Jean
od-manifest-schema-v1.2-os.rnc
Description: Text document
od-schema-v1.2-os.rnc
Description: Text document
schemas.xml
Description: XML document
- Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, (continued)
- Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/25
- Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/25
- Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/26
- Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/26
- Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/01/26
- Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/27
- Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el,
Jean Louis <=
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Ulrich Mueller, 2021/01/24
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Jean Louis, 2021/01/24
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/24
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Ulrich Mueller, 2021/01/24
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/25
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/26
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/26
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/01/26
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/26
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/01/26