[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jan 2021 16:44:43 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: Phillip Lord <phillip.lord@russet.org.uk>, Eli Zaretskii
> <eliz@gnu.org>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 15:39:27 -0500
>
> I think we'll only want to bundle a few specific packages, and I think
> it might be simpler to keep a copy of those specific packages in
> emacs.git
Does this mean you are backing up from the consensus of using
submodules?
> (in the form of branches, of course: we want to be able to
> easily sync those copies with the ones in elpa.git).
What does it mean "to keep a copy of a package in the form of
branches"? Can you describe the series of Git commands needed to
import such a copy into the Emacs Git repository, and what needs to be
done to routinely update such a copy from ELPA?
- Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, (continued)
- Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Phillip Lord, 2021/01/21
- Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stephen Leake, 2021/01/22
- Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/23
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stephen Leake, 2021/01/24
- Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Phillip Lord, 2021/01/24
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stephen Leake, 2021/01/25
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/25
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/25
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Andy Moreton, 2021/01/25
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/25
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stephen Leake, 2021/01/27
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/27