Re: Proposing changes to adjust_frame_size

[Tassilo Horn]

martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at> writes:

>>>>> Is this behavior new or did it already occur in Emacs 27?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, with my repro.el containing the `default-frame-alist' setting,
>>>> the initial frame has a menubar (until resize/focus), and the new
>>>> frame after C-x 5 2 has a scrollbar.
>>>
>>> And with Emacs 27 the initial frame did not have a menu bar initially
>>> and the new frame after C-x 5 2 did not have a scroll bar initially.
>>> Right?
>>
>> No, what I've written above as answer to your question was with emacs
>> 27.2.
>
> So can I conclude that the bad behavior was already there with Emacs 27?

Yes.

> I really should try to ask questions in a less ambiguous way.

Or just remember, when you ask, I'll answer immediately below to exactly
that question.  When I switch context, I'll make that clear. :-)

>>> Did my latest commit (c18403302df3f07a7f94c3984d65b808fb40e8c1) in this
>>> area change anything in this regard?
>>
>> Nope, "emacs -Q --load repro.el" (including `default-frame-alist'
>> setting) still results in
>>
>>    1. initial frame has a menubar (fsh1.txt)
>>    2. C-x 5 2 frame has a scrollbar (fsh2.txt)
>>
>> When commenting the `default-frame-alist' setting, all works as expected
>> (fsh3.txt for the initial frame and fsh4.txt for the new one created by
>> C-x 5 2).
>>
>> When comparing fsh1 vs. fsh3, and fsh2 vs. fsh4, one can see that the
>> set_window_configuration calls are only there if `default-frame-alist'
>> is set.
>
> Thanks, I have to study that now.

Have fun (if possible).

Bye,
Tassilo