[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs is not reproducible
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs is not reproducible |
Date: |
Mon, 17 May 2021 15:45:29 +0000 |
Hello, Bone.
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:28:18 -0400, Bone Baboon wrote:
> I am using the Guix operating system. It provides tools to verify if
> a software package is reproducible.
What does it even mean to say a software package is "reproducible"?
> <https://guix.gnu.org/en/manual/en/html_node/On-Trusting-Binaries.html#On-Trusting-Binaries>
>
> For details on how Emacs 27.2 is not reproducible see
> <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/35085#7>. Previous versions of
> Emacs are also not reproducible as reported in that thread.
> For information on why reproducible software is important see
> <https://reproducible-builds.org/>.
> For information on how to make software reproducible see
> <https://reproducible-builds.org/docs/>.
> Is there currently any work underway to make Emacs reproducible?
Without knowing what it means, I can't really say, but I suspect not.
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
- Emacs is not reproducible, Bone Baboon, 2021/05/17
- Re: Emacs is not reproducible,
Alan Mackenzie <=
- Re: Emacs is not reproducible, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/05/17
- Re: Emacs is not reproducible, Stefan Monnier, 2021/05/17
- Re: Emacs is not reproducible, Stefan Monnier, 2021/05/22
- Re: Emacs is not reproducible, Glenn Morris, 2021/05/23
- Re: Emacs is not reproducible, Stefan Monnier, 2021/05/25
- Re: Emacs is not reproducible, T.V Raman, 2021/05/25
- Re: Emacs is not reproducible, Glenn Morris, 2021/05/25
- Re: Emacs is not reproducible, Stefan Monnier, 2021/05/26
- Re: Emacs is not reproducible, Mattias EngdegÄrd, 2021/05/27