[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs is not reproducible
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs is not reproducible |
Date: |
Sun, 23 May 2021 19:52:08 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> There has been changes made in the past to fix some problems.
>> I have a pending patch in bug#46502 (see below) which aims to fix some
>> more of those problems, but still haven't heard confirmation that it
>> helps.
I did 10 builds with -j8; 5 without your patch and 5 with.
The builds without your patch had changes in 12, 10, 9, 11 elc files.
The builds with your patch had changes in 4, 4, 7, 4 elc files.
Mostly tramp.elc, ox-odt.elc, ox.elc, cc-mode.elc; sometimes in
eieio files. At least some of these seem to be https://debbugs.gnu.org/34322
So it seems better in terms of less elc variation.
It causes all tests in test/lisp/cedet/semantic-utest-ia.el to fail.
> What am I missing?
You forgot to make a grammar mistake, or propose changing the default
value of a user option. That's how you get comments on Emacs patches.
- Emacs is not reproducible, Bone Baboon, 2021/05/17
- Re: Emacs is not reproducible, Alan Mackenzie, 2021/05/17
- Re: Emacs is not reproducible, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/05/17
- Re: Emacs is not reproducible, Stefan Monnier, 2021/05/17
- Re: Emacs is not reproducible, Stefan Monnier, 2021/05/22
- Re: Emacs is not reproducible,
Glenn Morris <=
- Re: Emacs is not reproducible, Stefan Monnier, 2021/05/25
- Re: Emacs is not reproducible, T.V Raman, 2021/05/25
- Re: Emacs is not reproducible, Glenn Morris, 2021/05/25
- Re: Emacs is not reproducible, Stefan Monnier, 2021/05/26
- Re: Emacs is not reproducible, Mattias EngdegÄrd, 2021/05/27
- Re: Emacs is not reproducible, Stefan Monnier, 2021/05/27
- Re: Emacs is not reproducible, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2021/05/25
- Re: Emacs is not reproducible, Stefan Monnier, 2021/05/27
- Re: Emacs is not reproducible, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2021/05/28