[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?
From: |
Christopher Schmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Bug in structmode++? |
Date: |
Mon, 6 May 2013 18:07:20 +0100 (BST) |
Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:
> Igor Sosa Mayor <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Thanks Nicolas. At least, I dont feel alone anymore... Is there any
>> chance this getting fixed somehow? I used to use it very often in my
>> emails and I miss it.
>
> I miss it, too.
>
> I didn't follow recent changes to orgstruct-mode, so I cannot help
> here. I hope that someone more knowledgeable than I am will jump in.
orgstruct(++)-mode used to set auto-fill-function to
'org-auto-fill-function. This behaviour is too intrusive so we removed
it. You either need to indent secondary lines by hand or set
auto-fill-function back to org-auto-fill-function.
orgstruct++'s hijacker of org-insert-heading-respect-content did not
respect item bodies. I fixed this in master a few minutes ago.
741bc5c * origin/master master org.el: Execute org-insert-heading
and org-insert-heading-respect-content in orgstruct++-mode when the
context around point is an item-body.
Christopher
- [O] Bug in structmode++?, Igor Sosa Mayor, 2013/05/01
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, Igor Sosa Mayor, 2013/05/02
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/05/02
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, Igor Sosa Mayor, 2013/05/02
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/05/02
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?,
Christopher Schmidt <=
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, Bastien, 2013/05/07
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, Sebastien Vauban, 2013/05/07
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, Christopher Schmidt, 2013/05/07
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, Bastien, 2013/05/14
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, Daniel Bausch, 2013/05/14
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, The Dude, 2013/05/12