[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?
From: |
Christopher Schmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Bug in structmode++? |
Date: |
Tue, 7 May 2013 15:31:53 +0100 (BST) |
Bastien <address@hidden> writes:
>> orgstruct(++)-mode used to set auto-fill-function to
>> 'org-auto-fill-function. This behaviour is too intrusive so we
>> removed it. You either need to indent secondary lines by hand or set
>> auto-fill-function back to org-auto-fill-function.
>
> I don't remember why it was too intrusive, it worked fine for me.
We overwrite the major mode's custom value of auto-fill-function. This
is not The Right Thing in each and every case.
In message-mode this is not important,
(defun message-do-auto-fill ()
"Like `do-auto-fill', but don't fill in message header."
(unless (message-point-in-header-p)
(do-auto-fill)))
org-auto-fill-function does not do much harm here. That is not the case
for most prog modes, though.
You can easily get the old behaviour back by setting auto-fill-function
to org-auto-fill-function after you activate orgstruct{,++}-mode.
>> orgstruct++'s hijacker of org-insert-heading-respect-content did not
>> respect item bodies. I fixed this in master a few minutes ago.
>
> I just tried with orgstruct-mode and I still have the problem.
orgstruct-mode does not respect item-body context - see this form in
orgstruct-make-binding:
(org-context-p 'headline 'item
,(when (memq fun
'(org-insert-heading
org-insert-heading-respect-content
org-meta-return))
'(when orgstruct-is-++
'item-body)))
I think that's a feature.
> With orgstruct++-mode, M-RET on the second line of an item inserts an
> item correctly, but there is another problem (also for
> orgstruct-mode): M-RET on the first line of a two-lines item will
> insert the new item in the middle of the item...
So does vanilla org-mode?
Most people use orgstruct{,++}-mode in message-mode, right? I think it
makes sense to use vanilla org here. That is, make an indirect buffer
of the message-mode buffer, narrow the buffer to the message body and
set the major mode to org-mode. This should give one all the power of
Org, including links, footnotes, font-lock and so on, without that
orgstruct-mess.
Christopher
- [O] Bug in structmode++?, Igor Sosa Mayor, 2013/05/01
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, Igor Sosa Mayor, 2013/05/02
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/05/02
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, Igor Sosa Mayor, 2013/05/02
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/05/02
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, Christopher Schmidt, 2013/05/06
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, Bastien, 2013/05/07
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, Sebastien Vauban, 2013/05/07
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?,
Christopher Schmidt <=
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, Bastien, 2013/05/14
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, Daniel Bausch, 2013/05/14
Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, The Dude, 2013/05/12