[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Bug in structmode++? |
Date: |
Tue, 14 May 2013 10:59:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Christopher,
Christopher Schmidt <address@hidden> writes:
> Most people use orgstruct{,++}-mode in message-mode, right? I think it
> makes sense to use vanilla org here. That is, make an indirect buffer
> of the message-mode buffer, narrow the buffer to the message body and
> set the major mode to org-mode.
Mhh.. This looks too complex to me.
My guess is that message-mode and mail-mode are the modes where
orgstruct-mode is the most used, so having it doing what the users
expect is important.
At least there should be no regression wrt the previous behavior
of orgstruct-mode.
> This should give one all the power of
> Org, including links, footnotes, font-lock and so on, without that
> orgstruct-mess.
I sympathetize with your blame on the mess... but still, let's fix
the code, not users' behavior :)
But things are fine for me at the moment, I'll report issues if I
find some.
Best,
--
Bastien
- [O] Bug in structmode++?, Igor Sosa Mayor, 2013/05/01
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, Igor Sosa Mayor, 2013/05/02
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/05/02
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, Igor Sosa Mayor, 2013/05/02
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/05/02
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, Christopher Schmidt, 2013/05/06
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, Bastien, 2013/05/07
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, Sebastien Vauban, 2013/05/07
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, Christopher Schmidt, 2013/05/07
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?,
Bastien <=
- Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, Daniel Bausch, 2013/05/14
Re: [O] Bug in structmode++?, The Dude, 2013/05/12