[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features"
From: |
Bruce D'Arcus |
Subject: |
Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features" |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Feb 2023 11:04:25 -0500 |
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 7:23 AM Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> wrote:
>
> Timothy <orgmode@tec.tecosaur.net> writes:
>
> > Here is a list of terms which I’d feel comfortable applying to the system:
> > ⁃ export features
> > ⁃ export capabilities
> > ⁃ export snippets
>
> I am looking at the concept again, and I feel that we may be missing
> some flexibility here. I do not like the fact that each feature can only
> have a simple implementation within specific backend.
I'm not really following this discussion, but is this perhaps similar
to pandoc/djot's notion of "filters"?
https://github.com/jgm/djot.js#filters
Bruce
[POLL] Naming of "export features", Timothy, 2023/02/21
Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features", Ihor Radchenko, 2023/02/22
Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features", Sébastien Miquel, 2023/02/23
Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features", Ihor Radchenko, 2023/02/24
Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features", Sébastien Miquel, 2023/02/24
Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features", Ihor Radchenko, 2023/02/24
Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features", Sébastien Miquel, 2023/02/24
Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features", Ihor Radchenko, 2023/02/26
Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features", Sébastien Miquel, 2023/02/26
Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features", Ihor Radchenko, 2023/02/27
Re: [PATCH] Introduce "export features", No Wayman, 2023/02/11