[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features"
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features" |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Feb 2023 13:03:51 +0000 |
Sébastien Miquel <sebastien.miquel@posteo.eu> writes:
> For most changes, you'll have to copy and modify the original
> transcoder's implementation anyway. At this point, you might as well
> write the feature logic in lisp (checking features through =info=),
> instead of your `transcoder-conditions`.
Consider the feature request from the past about wrapping/prepending
to exported headings:
* Heading1
* Heading2
:PROPERTIES:
:LATEX_TEMPLATE: (:snippet "\clearpage" :order -100)
:END:
# This Heading2 will start on a new page
If we implement export transcoders as much as possible using templates,
it will become very easy for users to adjust the export behavior beyond
what is already possible.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
- Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features", (continued)
Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features", Ihor Radchenko, 2023/02/22
Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features", Sébastien Miquel, 2023/02/23
Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features", Ihor Radchenko, 2023/02/24
Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features", Sébastien Miquel, 2023/02/24
Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features",
Ihor Radchenko <=
Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features", Sébastien Miquel, 2023/02/24
Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features", Ihor Radchenko, 2023/02/26
Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features", Sébastien Miquel, 2023/02/26
Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features", Ihor Radchenko, 2023/02/27
Re: [PATCH] Introduce "export features", No Wayman, 2023/02/11
Re: Re: [PATCH] Introduce "export features", Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez, 2023/02/12