[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features"
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features" |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Feb 2023 19:04:23 +0000 |
"Bruce D'Arcus" <bdarcus@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm not really following this discussion, but is this perhaps similar
> to pandoc/djot's notion of "filters"?
>
> https://github.com/jgm/djot.js#filters
Nope. Filters are org-export-filters-alist.
What we are talking about is a generic way to test Org buffer contents +
AST and including/not including something into export output according
to the test result.
Like,
1. If there are images in Org source, include image-related CSS into
resulting html
2. If exported paragraph consists of a single image, export it as latex
"figure" environment. Otherwise, export as proper paragraph.
3. If we include \usepackage{foo} in latex export, there is no need to
\usepackage{bar} because "foo" loads "bar" anyway.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
- Re: [PATCH] Introduce "export features", (continued)
- Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features", Ihor Radchenko, 2023/02/22
- Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features", Sébastien Miquel, 2023/02/23
- Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features", Ihor Radchenko, 2023/02/24
- Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features", Sébastien Miquel, 2023/02/24
- Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features", Ihor Radchenko, 2023/02/24
- Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features", Sébastien Miquel, 2023/02/24
- Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features", Ihor Radchenko, 2023/02/26
- Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features", Sébastien Miquel, 2023/02/26
- Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features", Ihor Radchenko, 2023/02/27
Re: [PATCH] Introduce "export features", No Wayman, 2023/02/11
Re: Re: [PATCH] Introduce "export features", Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez, 2023/02/12