gnu-linux-libre
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review PureOS ISO


From: Ivan Zaigralin
Subject: Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review PureOS ISO
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 12:34:18 -0800
User-agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.4.29-gnu; KDE/4.14.21; x86_64; ; )

On Thursday, November 10, 2016 17:26:26 Francois Téchené wrote:
> That being said about the computers we sell, please let us know the
> exact steps we need to achieve to get endorsed?
> 
> From my understanding here are the steps :
> 
> - Disable the ability to use extensions in our version of Firefox
> (PureBrowser)

Yeah, this is a point of strong consensus, and it goes just as well for 
thunderbird and seamonkey. Addon page is one firefox issue everyone is aware 
of, but there may be others, and the best place to find out more is by talking 
to the icecat team.

> - Make a website dedicated to PureOS only avoiding any reference to
> Purism and the Librem.

Actually, if I were you, I would not give up on referencing your hardware 
products from the PureOS website. If Trisquel can recommend computers with 
non-free BIOS (they do) for use with their OS, you should be able to do so as 
well. I think you may be able to strike a compromise by making the separation 
between the PureOS project and the hardware place clear enough (different 
domains, styling), and explaining the inherent dangers of using non-free BIOS 
to PureOS users.

> (If you still think that we are promoting evil through our computers and
> don't think that there are some intermediate steps to get to freedom,
> then I don't share your point of view but I respect that.)
> 
> - Remove any FSF forbidden words from the PureOS website.
> 
> I guess that if the PureOS website has no link to the Purism website and
> only exposes ISO download as a way to install, you see no objection in
> having Purism help their users getting to freedom by shipping PureOS
> pre-installed in their Librem? If you force us using another OS for
> that, it would be a non-sense IMHO.

I am not sure I understand the first part of this question... It seems clear 
to me that your hardware front will not have to be compliant, so there cannot 
be any objection to shipping PureOS pre-installed. Your laptop front certainly 
can advertize and bundle PureOS.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]