[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review PureOS ISO
From: |
Julie Marchant |
Subject: |
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review PureOS ISO |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:53:15 -0500 |
On 11/10/2016 03:34 PM, Ivan Zaigralin wrote:
> Actually, if I were you, I would not give up on referencing your hardware
> products from the PureOS website. If Trisquel can recommend computers with
> non-free BIOS (they do) for use with their OS, you should be able to do so as
> well. I think you may be able to strike a compromise by making the separation
> between the PureOS project and the hardware place clear enough (different
> domains, styling), and explaining the inherent dangers of using non-free BIOS
> to PureOS users.
I agree with this entirely.
--
Julie Marchant
https://onpon4.github.io
Protect your emails with GnuPG:
https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review PureOS ISO, (continued)
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review PureOS ISO, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2016/11/10
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review PureOS ISO, Jean Louis, 2016/11/10
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review PureOS ISO, Matt Lee, 2016/11/10
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review PureOS ISO, Zlatan Todoric, 2016/11/10
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review PureOS ISO, Jean Louis, 2016/11/11
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review PureOS ISO, Ivan Zaigralin, 2016/11/10
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] review PureOS ISO,
Julie Marchant <=