[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?
From: |
G. Branden Robinson |
Subject: |
Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5? |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Oct 2020 02:37:25 +1100 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20180716 |
At 2020-10-10T17:34:02+0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > My main argument against that is a selfish one. Somebody would have
> > to go through all the Savannah tickets that are marked as fixed in
> > 1.22.5 and change them.
>
> Simply change the name of the label, and you are done. Internally, an
> ID gets used that is independent of the label name.
Ah! It's nice when things actually end up being done right. :)
Well, that evaporates my objection.
Regards,
Branden
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Releasing groff 1.22.5?, G. Branden Robinson, 2020/10/10
- Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, Colin Watson, 2020/10/10
- Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, G. Branden Robinson, 2020/10/10
- Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/10/10
- Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?,
G. Branden Robinson <=
- Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, Bertrand Garrigues, 2020/10/10
- Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/10/10
- Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, Bertrand Garrigues, 2020/10/11
- Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, Bertrand Garrigues, 2020/10/20
- Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, Bertrand Garrigues, 2020/10/21
Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, Peter Schaffter, 2020/10/10
Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, Bertrand Garrigues, 2020/10/10