[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5? |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Oct 2020 04:59:43 +0200 (CEST) |
> Just a question on the version though: We are talking about 1.23 and
> not 1.23.0, and I see that we also had a 1.22 version (not a
> 1.22.0), is there a particular reason to omit the patch number if it
> is equal to 0?
It looked nicer then for me, and I think I saw that for other GNU
packages, too – the zero is essentually redundant. No other special
reason.
Werner
- Releasing groff 1.22.5?, G. Branden Robinson, 2020/10/10
- Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, Colin Watson, 2020/10/10
- Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, G. Branden Robinson, 2020/10/10
- Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/10/10
- Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, G. Branden Robinson, 2020/10/10
- Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, Bertrand Garrigues, 2020/10/10
- Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, Bertrand Garrigues, 2020/10/11
- Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, Bertrand Garrigues, 2020/10/20
- Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, Bertrand Garrigues, 2020/10/21
Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, Peter Schaffter, 2020/10/10
Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, Bertrand Garrigues, 2020/10/10