[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?
From: |
Bertrand Garrigues |
Subject: |
Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5? |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Oct 2020 00:09:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Werner,
On Sat, Oct 10 2020 at 05:34:02 PM, Werner LEMBERG <wl@gnu.org> wrote:
>> My main argument against that is a selfish one. Somebody would have
>> to go through all the Savannah tickets that are marked as fixed in
>> 1.22.5 and change them.
>
> Simply change the name of the label, and you are done. Internally, an
> ID gets used that is independent of the label name.
Done, works fine.
Just a question on the version though: We are talking about 1.23 and not
1.23.0, and I see that we also had a 1.22 version (not a 1.22.0), is
there a particular reason to omit the patch number if it is equal to 0?
Regards,
Bertrand
- Releasing groff 1.22.5?, G. Branden Robinson, 2020/10/10
- Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, Colin Watson, 2020/10/10
- Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, G. Branden Robinson, 2020/10/10
- Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/10/10
- Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, G. Branden Robinson, 2020/10/10
- Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?,
Bertrand Garrigues <=
- Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/10/10
- Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, Bertrand Garrigues, 2020/10/11
- Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, Bertrand Garrigues, 2020/10/20
- Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, Bertrand Garrigues, 2020/10/21
Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, Peter Schaffter, 2020/10/10
Re: Releasing groff 1.22.5?, Bertrand Garrigues, 2020/10/10