[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: UTP Revisited: scoping the project
From: |
Larry McVoy |
Subject: |
Re: UTP Revisited: scoping the project |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:08:30 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 12:02:43PM -0600, Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
> By the way, Vim's infinite undo clearly violates the published
> standard (POSIX is clear that u undoes u)
I'm pretty sure there is a variable you can set to get vim to conform
with the standard. That said, I consider vim to be a significant upgrade
to the original to the point that if it isn't installed, I install it.
Pretty much any advatage emacs had went away with vim (unless you want
your editor to be your operating system, fine if you like that, just
not for me. Emacs in general is not for me, I lived in it for a year
and then gave up and went back to vi/vim).
- UTP Revisited: scoping the project, Larry Kollar, 2020/10/20
- Re: UTP Revisited: scoping the project, Ingo Schwarze, 2020/10/20
- Re: UTP Revisited: scoping the project, Larry McVoy, 2020/10/20
- Re: UTP Revisited: scoping the project, Larry Kollar, 2020/10/20
- Re: UTP Revisited: scoping the project, Marc Chantreux, 2020/10/20
- Re: UTP Revisited: scoping the project, James K. Lowden, 2020/10/22
Re: UTP Revisited: scoping the project, Mike Bianchi, 2020/10/20