[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: UTP Revisited: scoping the project
From: |
James K. Lowden |
Subject: |
Re: UTP Revisited: scoping the project |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:12:23 -0400 |
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:16:45 +0200
Marc Chantreux <eiro@phear.org> wrote:
> > I?ve not used another editor where you can pipe chunks of text *ad
> > hoc* through scripts or even awk/perl one-liners.
>
> except ed, sam (AFAIR), and every vi clones i used.
In emacs, you select the chunks of text, press M-|, and type the
command you want to pass it through. If you want the output to replace
the input, use C-u M-|.
Emacs is the only editor whose extension language is its implementation
language. There is no difference between extending emacs and changing
emacs. It's all one. Every single key is mapped to a function
ultimately of the user's choosing. Why would any software developer
use anything else?
:-)
--jkl
- Re: UTP Revisited: scoping the project, (continued)
- Re: UTP Revisited: scoping the project, Marc Chantreux, 2020/10/20
- Re: UTP Revisited: scoping the project, Ingo Schwarze, 2020/10/20
- Re: UTP Revisited: scoping the project, Larry McVoy, 2020/10/20
- Re: UTP Revisited: scoping the project, Larry Kollar, 2020/10/20
- Re: UTP Revisited: scoping the project, Marc Chantreux, 2020/10/20
- Re: UTP Revisited: scoping the project,
James K. Lowden <=
Re: UTP Revisited: scoping the project, Mike Bianchi, 2020/10/20